The following news was published four days ago:
SILIVRI, Turkey, October 16 (Compass Direct News) – After three prosecution witnesses testified yesterday that they didn’t even know two Christians on trial for “insulting Turkishness and Islam,” a defense lawyer called the trial a “scandal.”
Speaking after yesterday’s hearing in the drawn-out trial, defense attorney Haydar Polat said the case’s initial acceptance by a state prosecutor in northwestern Turkey was based only on a written accusation from the local gendarmerie headquarters unaccompanied by any documentation.
“It’s a scandal,” Polat said. “It was a plot, a planned one, but a very unsuccessful plot, as there is no evidence.”
Turkish Christians Hakan Tastan and Turan Topal were arrested in October 2006; after a two-day investigation they were charged with allegedly slandering Turkishness and Islam while talking about their faith with three young men in Silivri, an hour’s drive west of Istanbul. (End of quote.)
Last year, in the U.S., I was summoned to serve on a jury for a civil case, which took about a week of my time. As part of the process for preparing me to serve on a jury, I attended a half-day mandatory seminar on the responsibilities of jury duty. One of the most interesting aspects to the seminar was a judge’s presentation on her recent trip to Italy as a consultant on jurist issues in that country. What this judge explained to us that I was unaware of, is how unique the U.S. jurist system really is in the entire world. In Italy and many other countries, there is no concept of juries begin composed of a dozen or more common citizens chosen at random from the population. Instead, there are professional jurists of various degrees. In other countries, a judge or judges decide your guilt or innocence.
In Turkey, the courts don’t have a jury system. Judges alone decide your fate, if you are accused.
In the U.S., we have no laws condemning blasphemy against one’s notion of God. Our ancestors had suffered enough under such laws centuries ago to know that they did not want to recreate that system in the New World.
The real scandal is that anyone would be arrested for expressing their beliefs about God. The real scandal is that we Americans, who enjoy the freedom to share our religious views, accept the status quo in these other countries for the purpose of political expediency. We could, with the freedom we so generously have been given, take to the streets and demand our government puts pressure on these countries to reform their systems. We could decide that supporting free speech in the world was more important than protecting our access to power and influence and oil and all those material benefits that we enjoy while looking the other way when men, women and children are arrested, tortured, imprisoned, and killed because they said something about God that someone else didn’t like.
We could, but we don’t.
And that, my friends, is truly scandalous.
