Archive for the ‘Middle East’ Category

A scandal at heart of blasphemy case

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

The following news was published four days ago:

SILIVRI, Turkey, October 16 (Compass Direct News) – After three prosecution witnesses testified yesterday that they didn’t even know two Christians on trial for “insulting Turkishness and Islam,” a defense lawyer called the trial a “scandal.”

Speaking after yesterday’s hearing in the drawn-out trial, defense attorney Haydar Polat said the case’s initial acceptance by a state prosecutor in northwestern Turkey was based only on a written accusation from the local gendarmerie headquarters unaccompanied by any documentation.

“It’s a scandal,” Polat said. “It was a plot, a planned one, but a very unsuccessful plot, as there is no evidence.”

Turkish Christians Hakan Tastan and Turan Topal were arrested in October 2006; after a two-day investigation they were charged with allegedly slandering Turkishness and Islam while talking about their faith with three young men in Silivri, an hour’s drive west of Istanbul. (End of quote.)

Last year, in the U.S., I was summoned to serve on a jury for a civil case, which took about a week of my time. As part of the process for preparing me to serve on a jury, I attended a half-day mandatory seminar on the responsibilities of jury duty. One of the most interesting aspects to the seminar was a judge’s presentation on her recent trip to Italy as a consultant on jurist issues in that country. What this judge explained to us that I was unaware of, is how unique the U.S. jurist system really is in the entire world. In Italy and many other countries, there is no concept of juries begin composed of a dozen or more common citizens chosen at random from the population. Instead, there are professional jurists of various degrees. In other countries, a judge or judges decide your guilt or innocence.

In Turkey, the courts don’t have a jury system. Judges alone decide your fate, if you are accused.

In the U.S., we have no laws condemning blasphemy against one’s notion of God. Our ancestors had suffered enough under such laws centuries ago to know that they did not want to recreate that system in the New World.

The real scandal is that anyone would be arrested for expressing their beliefs about God. The real scandal is that we Americans, who enjoy the freedom to share our religious views, accept the status quo in these other countries for the purpose of political expediency. We could, with the freedom we so generously have been given, take to the streets and demand our government puts pressure on these countries to reform their systems. We could decide that supporting free speech in the world was more important than protecting our access to power and influence and oil and all those material benefits that we enjoy while looking the other way when men, women and children are arrested, tortured, imprisoned, and killed because they said something about God that someone else didn’t like.

We could, but we don’t.

And that, my friends, is truly scandalous.

HR defenders need advocacy, too

Friday, July 24th, 2009

Joseph Francis, a minority rights defender in Pakistan, was jailed by Islamists in Pakistan on July 12th, according to Compass Direct News. According to a statement from the Centre for Legal Aid Assistance and Settlement in Lahore, “His only crime was to help suffering parents of a young Christian girl who was taken away from her family.” Francis was involved in an all-too-typical case in Middle Eastern countries: a marital dispute between a Muslim and a Christian, in which the Muslim man claims to have become a Christian in order to convince a Christian woman to marry him, but after the marriage, pressures his wife to convert to Islam. These kinds of cases can be extremely difficult to resolve, because in Islamic countries, preference in laws governing all family matters is given to the Muslim spouse.

Middle Eastern human rights advocates like Francis often pay a heavy price for their moral calling on behalf of others. Human rights defenders in countries where human rights abuses flourish often suffer to a greater degree even than those for whom they advocate. This is really no surprise. Government and societal leaders who use oppressive tactics against a minority population figure that targeting the “ring leaders” will cause a serious blow to the morale of a persecuted people being denied fair treatment. They hope to instill fear in those who may then feel too weak to continue pressing for more humane treatment. Targeting a ringleader is an effective way to scare others into compliance.

Journalists and indigenous attorneys who defend minority rights, in particular, pay a heavy price. Often, human rights abuses are closely tied to government corruption. Since those who are victims of corrupt officials often seek out journalists to hear their stories, journalists often find themselves the targets of corrupt officials. Attorneys who represent those persecuted for their faith often find themselves besieged with threats of violence, even death, and harassment from governmental authorities and police.

It can be difficult to separate out the various factors that contribute to human rights abuses. Minority populations are always more susceptible to being victimized, and in the Middle East, being a member of a minority religion often means being mistreated. Government policies can either encourage or discourage what is often long-standing societal discrimination. Unfortunately, it’s uncommon for a government in the Middle East to urge its people toward tolerance and away from discrimination. As a result, people grow up with a bad attitude, essentially.

I heard of one young woman raised in an Islamic family, who as a schoolgirl, chaffed in indignation at the placement of her desk next to a Christian girl’s desk. She had been raised to view Christians as inferior. She worked hard to make life as uncomfortable as possible for her desk mate. Later, she herself became a Christian, and was confronted as a young adult with life-threatening abuse from the same family members who had reared her to hate Christians.

Magnify this story by millions of people, and you begin to see the immensity of the task these native advocates face daily.

When governments confront corruption, and expose it, there is a greater opportunity to make real progress on improving human rights. But, before governments can confront corruption – particularly in the Middle East – someone needs to confront government. Most people will take a lot of abuse before they reach the breaking point and start forming into angry mobs in the streets that demand justice, perhaps at the risk of being shot or arrested. Even though we have seen this kind of anger erupt this past year in Egypt and Iran, most people remain too afraid, and all too aware of their frailties to mount serious opposition. But, native human rights defenders are those courageous people who have counted the cost and are willing to lay down their lives on behalf of defending those suffering persecution and mistreatment.

Without these native advocates, there would be little likelihood that we in the West could effectively improve human rights in this region of the world. We’re outsiders, but they are insiders – native sons and daughters who hear an inner voice of conscience and respond.

Many of these advocates have suffered greatly. Some have been murdered. Others have had to flee for their lives. Some have had their names posted by vigilantes who urge those who may spot them on the streets to murder them in the name of God. Some have had to move from apartment to apartment- from village to village – from city to city- fleeing persecutors who are one step behind them. Others willingly allow themselves to be taken captive, hoping for an opportunity to testify in courts that have been corrupted by bribery and the darkness of prejudice, hatred, and ignorance. Still, these native advocates hope that someone will hear their voice – that conscience will be pricked and someone holding the gavel or the power to effect change will catch the vision and become part of the solution.

When we are fortunate enough to even hear their testimonies in the West – many never have their stories told outside their own countries – we should thank God for their courage and love for their fellow man. It is difficult work these advocates do. It is very hard. They work under extremely difficult conditions. There is rarely enough money available to them to take care of those among them who need medical help, legal help, and emotional comfort. Their work endangers their own families. Some never marry for that very reason. They endure all these difficulties because they have a fiery love for their fellow man, and a strong sense of both justice and mercy. They hate injustice; yet, they know that the only way to overcome persecution is to love mercy and to be willing to forgive those who abuse them.

In the end, it is this love that makes them most dangerous of all to those who fear them and seek to silence them.

Remember these native defenders.

Church burning reveals opponents tenacity

Thursday, July 23rd, 2009

One week ago Compass Direct News reported that villagers in the Egyptian village of Ezbet Basillious in Minya suspected local police in Egypt of corruption and collusion. The charge came in the wake of an arson attack on a church, presumably by Islamic adherents who reportedly shouted “Allahu Akbar,” as they entered the church.

Following the attack, two Coptic Christians were arrested for the arson attack on their own church.

Other Coptic Christians pointed to the unsubstantiated arrests of the Copts, and that police guards who were stationed outside the church had left their posts to drink tea at a local cafe, while the church burned. Those two facts, said local Copts, indicated police collusion in the attack on the church.

Witnesses reported to Compass News Direct that one of the guards was heard telling people, “Say Reda [Gamal] set fire to the church.” Reda Gamal was one of the Copts later arrested on suspicion of having set the church on fire.

This event is all the more intriguing because it offers a glimpse into the incredible tenacity of the formidable opposition remaining against any visible demonstration of Christianity in Egypt, and particularly in Minya. This opposition continues to effectively prevent new churches from being constructed despite strides made in eliminating long-standing previous legal obstacles to church construction and repair in Egypt.

The Egyptian government requires religious adherents to petition for governmental approval to use a building for religious gatherings. Typically churches have had an extremely difficult time securing this permission, as well as gaining official approval to repair churches or construct new ones. In the recent past, the Egyptian government responded to international criticism in this area by streamlining the approval process. In this latest church attack in Egypt, this church was a house church that had been promised a prayer license on July 3rd. This permission followed a 30-year struggle, so far unsuccessful, for this church to construct a new worship facility. After finally achieving one small step in the dream of having a suitable place to worship, Islamists responded by burning the church. Adding insult to injury, the Christians were themselves charged with arson.

This kind of police collusion was seen, at one time, in Southern communities in the United States where I spent my childhood. It took a great struggle to finally break through this horrible problem and restore dignity to a suffering African-American population.

However, the U.S. did have much better laws protecting religious expression than Egypt has had. Although the country’s constitution gives lip service to protecting religious freedom, Egypt’s citizenry has lived for three decades under an official state of emergency, which has suspended constitutional protections. As a result, these laws are only enforced at the whim of local officials.

This places the onus of ensuring religious freedom on the arbitrary decisions of local Egyptian police – a most unsatisfactory arrangement for the nation’s millions of Christians and other religious minorities. Such a state of affairs is a perfect breeding ground for smoldering anger, which erupts periodically, tragically inciting injury and death to Egyptians as sectarianists rise up against their own countrymen.

There is hope, however, in native religious minority presses that are issuing appeals to the nation’s conscience. These presses publish Christian and secular articles and are operated at great risk and sacrifice by the same kind of pioneers who once pamphleteered against an oppressive government ruling over colonies that later became the United States of America.

If you would like to help further this collective voice of conscience for this historically great nation of Egypt, please visit our website.